






Two Penn Center Plaza
Suite 910
Philadelphia, PA 19102
215.569.0000
•
One Oxford Centre
Suite 4300
Pittsburgh, PA 15219
412.255.3767
•
Sentry Office Plaza
Suite 602
216 Haddon Ave.
Westmont, NJ 08108
856.858.9499
Disclaimer
|
 |

Pre-Employment Concerns
Under the Americans with Disabilities Act
Silverman Bernheim & Vogel
QUESTIONS TO AVOID ON JOB APPLICATIONS
Employers may not use application forms to ask any questions which would
be impermissible to ask during the job interview.
Under the ADA, questions pertaining to an applicant's health or disability
may not be included on an application. For example, the question: "Do you
have any physical or mental limitations?" is forbidden. Similarly, an employer
may not use an application form that lists a number of mental or physical
conditions and asks the applicant to check off any of the conditions that
she/he may have.
Questions pertaining to worker's compensation history or prior sick leave
usage may not be included on an application under the ADA. Thus, the question:
"Have you ever filed a worker's compensation claim?" obviously is forbidden.
NOTE: At the post-offer stage (but prior to the start of work), an employer may
ask about an individual's worker's compensation history, prior sick leave usage,
illnesses, diseases/impairments and general physical and mental health. However,
if the individual is then denied the job, the employer must be ready to demonstrate
that the reason for exclusion is job related and consistent with business necessity
and/or that the individual posses a direct threat to himself or others.
Employers would be well advised to avoid using on their multi-purpose application
forms any travel related questions, such as: "Do you have a car," "Are you willing
to travel," or "Do you have a driver's license?" Again, employers do not want to
appear discriminatory, and many applicants with disabilities may not have a car
or a driver's license, or be able or willing to travel. Additionally, such
requirements would ordinarily not be job related for the vast majority of
public sector jobs. To the extent that such a requirement is necessary for
a particular job, the applicant could be asked to complete a supplemental
application, or the question could be raised at the interview as part of a
discussion of the essential job duties of the position. Moreover, for driving
positions, an employer may want to use a supplemental application with
additional questions pertaining to the applicant's driving record, car
insurance, etc.
PERMISSIBLE AND IMPERMISSIBLE PRE-OFFER DISABILITY RELATED INQUIRIES
During the interview, employers may not ask a broad question about impairments
that is likely to illicit information about a disability such as: "What impairments
do you have?" However, employers may ask questions about an applicant's impairments
if the particular question is not likely to illicit information about whether the
applicant has a disability. For example, an employer may ask an applicant with a
broken leg how he or she broke the leg. But such questions as: "Do you expect
the leg to heal normally'?' or "Do you break bones easily?" would be disability
related and therefore prohibited.
When there is a known disability', the interviewer may not ask questions
about the nature of the disability, the severity of the disability, the
condition causing the disability, the prognosis regarding the condition or
disability, or whether the individual will need treatment or special leave
because of the disability.
In some instances, an interviewer may perceive that an applicant has a
disability, for example, when the applicant has a physical abnormality that
is not a disability. Although it might be difficult to ignore physical
abnormalities when interviewing or testing a job applicant, it is important
to focus on the applicant's ability to do the job, not what the interviewer
thinks the applicant can or cannot do. It is important to stick to objective
performance-based evaluations.
At the pre-offer stage, employers may not ask about an applicant's job related
injuries or workers' compensation history, nor may the employer ask how many
days an applicant was sick. These types of questions relate directly to the
severity of an individual's impairment and are likely to elicit information
about a disability. However, the interviewer may provide information on an
employer's regular work hours, leave policies and any special attendance needs
of the job and ask if the applicant could meet these requirements.
Questions about whether an applicant can perform major life activities (e.g.,
walking) are almost always likely to elicit information about a disability.
Therefore, these questions are prohibited at the pre-offer stage unless they
are specifically about an ability to perform job functions. However, employers
may ask questions to determine whether an applicant can perform specific job
functions although these questions should not be phrased in terms of disability.
For example, if a person has only one arm and an essential function of ajob
is to drive a car, the interviewer should not ask if or how the disability
would affect this person's driving. The person may be asked if he or she
has a valid driver's license, and whether he or she can perform any special
aspect of driving that is required, such as frequent long distance trips,
with or without an accommodation. If an applicant indicates that he or she
cannot perform an essential job function even with an accommodation, the
applicant would not be qualified for the job in question.
When an employer reasonably believes that an applicant will not be able to
perform a job function because of a *known disability, the employer may ask
that particular applicant to describe or demonstrate how he or she would
perform the essential functions of the job, and with what accommodation
(whether or not the employer routinely makes such a request of all applicants
in the job category). If the known disability of an applicant will not
interfere with or prevent the performance of ajob-related function, the employer
may only request a description or demonstration by the applicant if it routinely
makes such a request of all applicants in the same job category.
* An applicant's disability is a known disability either because it is obvious
or because the applicant has voluntarily disclosed that he or she has a hidden
disability or that he or she needs a reasonable accommodation to perform the job.
Employers may ask about an applicant's ability to perform marginal job functions.
However, they may not refuse to hire an applicant with a disability because the
applicant's disability prevents him or her from performing marginal functions.
Employers may ask an applicant at the pre-offer stage whether he or she has
certifications or licenses required for any job duties. Employers may ask an
applicant whether he or she intends to get a particular job-related certification
or license or why he or she does not have the certification or license.
DRUGS AND ALCOHOL
Covered entities under the ADA may prohibit the illegal use of drugs and the
use of alcohol at the workplace by all employees and may require that employees
not be under the influence of alcohol at the workplace. Employers may hold an
employee who engages in the illegal use of drugs or who is an alcoholic to the
same qualification standards for employment or job performance and behavior
that such entity holds other employees, even if unsatisfactory performance or
behavior is related to the drug use or alcoholism of such employee.
Under the ADA, the term "qualified individual with a disability" does not
include any employee who is currently engaging in the illegal use of drugs2
when the employer acts on the basis of such use. The ADA does, however,
protect individuals who have successfully completed or are participating
in a supervised rehabilitation program3 and are no longer using illegal
drugs. (The policy objective here is to prevent employees from firing
persons solely on the basis of their past drug use.) Thus, past addiction
to illegal drugs or controlled substances is a covered disability under
the ADA.
3A supervisory rehabilitation program does not include only a program that
is medically supervised on an in-house basis. It may also encompass subsequent
on-going supervisory programs that typically follow in-patient treatment, such
as counseling or weekly NA meetings.
Whether an employee is a current user must be assessed at the time the
adverse employment action is taken. However, "currently" does not
necessarily mean on the days or weeks before the employment decision.
It means that the illegal use of drugs has occurred recently enough to
indicate illegal drug use means use of drugs, the possession or distribution
of which is unlawful under the Controlled Substance Act. that the employee is
actively engaged.4 Moreover, with regard to the term "no longer using illegal
drugs, that refers to long-term abstinence from drug use, not immediate
abstinence.
4 By way of example, in Collings v. Longview Fibre Company, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS
21709 (6th Cir. 1995), the court found that despite the fact that the employee
was drug free on the date of discharge, his own admission of drug involvement
during the weeks and months prior to his discharge indicated he was recently
involved in drug-related misconduct. ~ Wormley v. Arkla, Inc., 871 F.Supp.
1079 (E.D. Ark. 1994) (employee's cocaine use in months before he entered
rehabilitation was "current" for purposes of the ADA.)
Thus, at the pre-offer stage, employers may not ask applicants any questions
about their prior illegal drug use that are likely to elicit information
about a disability. However, employers may ask applicants about their current
illegal use of drugs because current drug use is not protected under the ADA.
Questions about medicinal drug use are not recommended because they are likely
to elicit information about a disability.
Employers may ask applicants about their current, lawful drug use if the employer
is administering a test for illegal use of drugs and an applicant tests positive
for illegal drug use. For example, if an applicant tests positive for the use of
a controlled substance, employers may lawfully ask questions such as: "What
medications have you taken that might have resulted in this positive result?"
or "Are you taking this medication under a lawful prescription?"
Employers, at the pre-offer stage, may not ask applicants any questions likely
to elicit information about alcoholism, which is a disability. Employers may
not ask whether an applicant has ever been in an alcohol rehabilitation program.
However, employers may ask whether the applicant drinks alcohol (but not how much)
or whether the applicant has been arrested for driving under the influence if
the job involves driving because these questions do not reveal whether
someone has alcoholism.
MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS
Employers may not require a medical examination of an applicant at the
pre-offer stage, but may condition a job offer on the results of a post-offer
medical examination (which may include drug testing), if all entering employees
in the same job category are required to take this examination, regardless of
disability. If the individual is screened out because of a disability, the
employer must show that the exclusionary criterion is job-related and consistent
with business necessity. If the individual is screened out for safety reasons,
the employer must demonstrate that the individual poses a"direct threat"
(a significant risk of substantial harm to him/herself or others, and the
risk cannot be reduced below the direct threat level through reasonable
accommodation).
Because AIDS is a condition protected by the ADA, employers should not
require HIV screening as part of their post-offer, pre-employment medical
testing. Even if an applicant admits that he or she tested positive for
HIV infection, unless there are other business-related reasons not to give
the applicant the job, employers should not remove the applicant from
consideration. While it might be tempting to do so, the employer will
be risking a discrimination suit.
Employers must keep any medical information they obtain on an applicant
or employee confidential, except in the following situations: (1) supervisors
may be told about necessary job restrictions of the employee and about
necessary accommodations; (2) first aid and safety personnel may be told
if the disability might require emergency treatment; (3) governmental,
officials investigating compliance with the ADA must be given relevant
information on request; (4) employers may give information to state workers'
compensation offices, state second injury funds or workers! compensation
insurance carriers in accordance with state workers' compensation insurance
carrier in accordance with state laws; and (5) employers may use the
information for insurance purposes (e.g., to administer a health insurance
plan). Employers must keep medical information confidential even if someone
is no longer an applicant (e.g., an applicant that was not hired) or is no
longer an employee.
Any medical information collected must be maintained on separate forms
and in separate medical files. According to the EEOC, medical information
may not be kept in an employee's regular personnel file, and employers
should not place any medical-related material in an employee's non-medical
personnel file. However, employers are not required to remove from their
personnel files medical information obtained before the ADA's effective
date (7/26/92).
NOTE: Private employers may not give alcohol tests to applicants
because tests to determine whether and/or how much alcohol an individual
has consumed are medical.
REASONABLE ACCOMODATION
Under the ADA, job applicants may request a reasonable accommodation or
modification to participate in the job application or interview process.
Accommodations are to be individually tailored, on a case-by-case basis,
to meet the specific needs of both the employer and the disabled job
applicant. The accommodation does not have to be the best accommodation
possible so long as it is sufficient to meet the needs of the individual
being accommodated.
For more information contact Lawrence M. Silverman.
Copyright 2002 by Silverman Bernheim & Vogel - All Rights Reserved.
<< Back to Article Index
|
|